May 6 07:33
12 days ago
43 viewers *
German term

wirtschaftliche Neugründungen

German to English Bus/Financial Business/Commerce (general)
Hi,

Translating the record of the shareholders’ meeting of a German GmbH (Memorandum and Articles of Association, notarised).
When asking Google to define the term concerned, it does not look all that straightforward anymore ...
Overly free translations not welcome as we will have to confirm the accuracy of the translation, slightly verbose translations acceptable this time around.

DE:
2.4
Den Beteiligten ist bekannt, dass die Satzungsänderung erst mit ihrer Eintragung im Handelsregister wirksam wird.
2.5
Wirtschaftliche Neugründungen sind dem Registergericht offen zu legen.

EN:
Any economic start-ups/establishments are to be disclosed to the registration court.

Best regards,

Discussion

Arne Krueger May 7:
@AllegroTrans I see. Could be, yes. But not sure if Sebastian has this information. In any case, wirtschaftliche Neugründung is certainly not a term specifically used for insolvency cases.
Arne Krueger May 6:
Hi Michael, first, I can see where you come from. But some things to note. This book is for SPAC/IPO-related issues. I cannot see how a GmbH can make an IPO. There are certainly ways to trade its shares in private markets, but it just isn't the right legal construction for it. Secondly, as mentioned in my comment for your answer, it may be a wrong translation. Why? Let us read this sentence on page 63. "...from the date of disclosure of the "economic re-incorporation" of the company to the underlying register court." The problem I have with this sentence (and the entire concept behind it) is that what we are talking about is already incorporated... So there is no re-incorporation but a rewriting of the business purpose of this "vehicle". I hope you can follow me. I just think it is a wrong term. And if so, a real major one...
Arne Krueger May 6:
Björn, I can only imagine that Neugründungen refers to all possible options... I believe the term is quite specific to German law, so not sure if any equivalent expression exists in English, as written below in my answer.
I only know of the following:
https://www.gov.uk/restart-a-non-trading-or-dormant-company

That's the Mantel-GmbH part, basically, though being considered dormant, for corporation tax at least, includes not only a business that has "stopped trading and has no other income, for example investments" but also any "new limited company that hasn’t started trading."

So, if someone wants to turn this into a verb phrase, I'm all ears. However, it's still not clear to me what purpose this sentence serves here. Here's an example:
https://www.ihk-muenchen.de/de/Service/Recht-und-Steuern/Ver...

How does that sentence fit in there?

I assume it's because of the previously mentioned "Satzungsänderung":
"Der entscheidende Zeitpunkt dafür ist die Satzungsänderung, die die wirtschaftliche Neugründung der ruhenden GmbH auslöst."
https://www.appelhagen.de/informationen/news/einzelansicht/a...

But why pluralize and make it a general statement? Sorry if I don't see it right now.

To all of you, have a nice evening; have to bow out here.
Arne Krueger May 6:
Getroffene Hunde bellen bekanntlich... ahaha Nein, ehrlich gesagt hatte ich mich verlesen. Ich dachte ein mir gut bekannter "Bot" wäre dabei. Mein Fehler. War aber auch nur scherzhaft gemeint, weil 4 negative Einträge da einfach nicht angebracht sind... Wie gesagt, man muss sich mit der Materie beschäftigen, dann versteht man diesen Eintrag von Sakshi auch. Ich weiß nicht, ob sie so tiefgründig denkt oder ob es nur Glück war. Wie auch immer. Jetzt jedenfalls nicht mehr im Minus... :)
Maja_K May 6:
"Bot-artig"? Ja, Bot-artige Vorschläge verdienen Bot-artige Reaktionen.
Arne Krueger May 6:
Ja, das Problem ist, dass es sich wie ich bereits in "Englisch" schrieb, um einen allgemeinen Begriff im Gesellschaftsvertrag handelt. Es ist nicht einsichtig, was damit beabsichtigt ist. Deshalb ist es eine mögliche Variante der Interpretation, aber nicht der gesuchte Begriff. Mein positiver Eintrag bezog sich eher auf die Bot-artige negative Markierung von einigen Forumsteilnehmern... ;) Im Übrigen denke ich auch nicht, dass es sich hier um ein start-up handelt...
@Arne It says "kann auch" at your link:
"Problematisch ist unter Umständen jedoch die Abgrenzung der wirtschaftlichen Neugründung einer Mantelgesellschaft einerseits von der Umstrukturierung bzw. Sanierung einer Gesellschaft andererseits...Nach der Rechtsprechung des BGH sind beide Fälle strikt voneinander zu trennen und nur die Verwendung einer Mantelgesellschaft den Regeln der wirtschaftlichen Neugründung zu unterwerfen."
https://www.dnoti.de/download/?tx_dnotionlineplusapi_downloa...

"Eine als wirtschaftliche Neugründung anzusehende Mantelverwendung liegt in Abgrenzung zu der Umorganisation (Umstrukturierung) oder Sanierung einer – noch – aktiven GmbH vor, wenn eine GmbH eine 'leere Hülse' geworden ist, also kein aktives Unternehmen mehr betreibt,..."
https://www.juris.de/static/infodienst/autoren/D_KORE4066420...

The second link is from this year. The only thing that seems certain here is the use of a shell/shelf company in most cases; I don't think your link disputes that.

Have a nice Monday
Arne Krueger May 6:
Reference for "business restructuring" case:
https://www.heuking.de/de/news-events/newsletter-fachbeitrae...
I wish... ...people would read at least part of what has been posted.

The difference between a "Gründung" and a "Neugründung" is the reuse of an existing structure or vehicle:
"In die Situation einer wirtschaftlichen Neugründung können Gesellschafter und Geschäftsführer auf zwei unterschiedliche Arten geraten. In der einen Variante, der Verwendung einer Vorrats-GmbH geschieht dies quasi mit Vorsatz, wenngleich auch nicht immer im Bewusstsein der sich ergebenden rechtlichen Konsequenzen. In der anderen Variante, der Wiederverwendung einer vorübergehend inaktiven Gesellschaft ist die ‒ meist unerfreuliche ‒ Überraschung umso größer."

So while I mostly agree with Adrian, just saying "newly created" doesn't work.

Also, what's been missing is the other way to get to a Neugründung, a Mantel-Gmbh [Adrian mentioned it, but I don't see it as part of his answer].

Cf.
https://www.notar-von-bergner.de/gmbh-verkaufen-die-wichtigs...
https://www.haufe.de/recht/deutsches-anwalt-office-premium/1...
https://www.proz.com/kudoz/german-to-english/law-contracts/4...
Doch noch einmal... ...mich wurmt das, weil eigentlich haben wir doch noch gar nichts für "wirtschaftliche Neugründung"? Du übersetzt "articles of association". Da geht es doch kaum darum, dass die GmbH andere Unternehmen gründet? Das ist doch ein Allgemeinsatz laut des Urteils, deshalb steht doch vorher: "Den Beteiligten ist bekannt, dass die Satzungsänderung erst mit ihrer Eintragung im Handelsregister wirksam wird."

Von Haufe: "Indizien einer wirtschaftlichen Neugründung können insbesondere sein, dass die Firma oder der Unternehmensgegenstand geändert, der Sitz verlegt, die Geschäftsführung ausgetauscht oder die Geschäftsanteile veräußert werden."

Hier geht es doch um "changing a company's purpose" etc., also um ein *abstraktes* Konzept, nicht um das "vehicle" (wie ein SPAC), was dazu benutzt wird?

Vielleicht bis später und vielen Dank fürs Mitlesen.
PS2 Beides möglich:
"Offenlegung der wirtschaftlichen Neugründung
Werden Shelf Companies oder Shell Companies verwendet und ihnen (neues) Leben eingehaucht, muss diese Aktivierung als wirtschaftliche Neugründung gegenüber dem Registergericht offengelegt werden. So bekommt das Registergericht die Chance, zu prüfen, ob die Kapitalausstattung der Gesellschaft ordnungsgemäß ist – wie bei einer Neugründung. Ist das Gesellschaftsvermögen im Zeitpunkt der Offenlegung zu niedrig und erreicht es nicht die Stammkapitalziffer, müssen die Gesellschafter diese Lücke auffüllen."
https://www.cmshs-bloggt.de/gesellschaftsrecht/mergers-acqui...

Jetzt muss ich aber selber weiter arbeiten.

Grüße
PS "The GmbH (Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; German private limited company) is the most successful form of company in Germany. Its popularity is unbroken and grows from year to year, with over 1.2 million GmbHs registered in Germany as of 1 January 2017.

Foreign investors, too, regularly use a GmbH as an operating or holding company in Germany. They have the choice between forming a new GmbH and buying a shelf company (Vorratsgesellschaft)."
https://vorratsgesellschaften.dnotv.de/english-version/why-a...

"Instead of establishing a completely new company the purchase of a so-called shelf company is possible. This will be a bare-shell company deemed to be formed by a service provider and without business activities."
https://www.heuking.de/fileadmin/DATA/Dokumente/Internationa...

"What is a shelf company?
A shelf company is a limited company that has been pre-registered with Companies House (the UK’s registrar of companies) for the purpose of selling it on at a later date.

Shelf companies are also often referred to as ‘off the shelf’ or ‘ready made’ companies."
https://www.1stformations.co.uk/blog/shelf-companies/
@Sebastian Das könnte gut helfen: https://www.haufe.de/recht/weitere-rechtsgebiete/wirtschafts...

[Majas Links sind auch gut; ich fand das bei Haufe nur übersichtlicher.]

Klingt für mich nach einer "shell company", bspw.:
"For these purposes a Shell Company is a company which:

is not carrying on a trade
is not a company with an investment business; and
is not carrying on a UK property business."
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/company-taxation-ma...

Das passt doch ganz gut:
"The law also allows business owners to create a shell company with the sole purpose to hold funds prior to setting up a new limited or any other type of company, and then transfer the said funds there. An example of this would be when you are closing an existing company and you want to redistribute its assets to a new company that you plan to start."
https://www.yourcompanyformations.co.uk/blog/how-secret-comp...

Vielleicht kann ich nachher nochmal schauen.

Beste Grüße

Proposed translations

+2
26 mins
German term (edited): wirtschaftlich/e Neugründung/en
Selected

commercial, ready-to-trade start-up/s

Wirtschaftliche Neugründungen sind dem Registergericht offen zu legen : use a passive construction, even if an active one is otherwise stylistically recommended:

'The Court of Registration is to be disclosed any commercial, ready-to-trade start-ups'

First weblink: 'GmbH: Wirtschaftliche Neugründung – Was ist das? 1. Eine GmbH wurde *auf Vorrat* = ready-to-trade, off-the-shelf etc. commercial co. gegründet. Sie hat bislang noch keinen Geschäftsbetrieb aufgenommen. Sie ruhte nur, damit sie im Bedarfsfall schnell aktiviert werden kann. 2. Der andere Fall stellt eine GmbH dar, die ihren Geschäftsbetrieb eingestellt hat und als *leerer Mantel* bestehen bleibt eben zu dem Zweck, im Bedarfsfall schnell wieder aktiviert werden zu können.'
Example sentence:

IATE: de Neugründung von Industriebetrieben COM en start-up of industrial enterprise

Discover what it takes to thrive as a new trade start-up.

Peer comment(s):

agree Maja_K : https://www.fgvw.de/neues/archiv-2023/gesellschaftsrecht-ges...
1 min
Lepo hvala, danke schön and thanks, Maja!
agree AllegroTrans
3 hrs
Thanks and danke schön, Chris! You've picked another winner.
neutral philgoddard : Bits of your explanation hint at the correct meaning, but I don't feel your translation captures it. And 'the court is to be disclosed' is ungrammatical.
4 hrs
You're right only on the 1st count of failing to nail an exact 'ready to activate' equivalent, though I used to work in (BrE) company (AmE) corporate & partnership. On the 2nd count, I spelled out the trivial objections to using passive vs. active form.
Something went wrong...
3 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
-3
28 mins

Business Restructuring

encompasses a range of activities including reorganizing legal, ownership, operational, or other structures of a company to make it more profitable, organized, or better equipped for current business demands...

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/restructuring.asp

It discusses the reasons behind restructuring such as improving profitability, merging with other companies, or adapting to a changing economic environment.
Peer comment(s):

disagree Maja_K : https://www.dhpg.de/de/newsroom/blog/wirtschaftliche-neugrue... --> "... sei es auch unter wesentlicher Umgestaltung, Einschränkung oder Erweiterung des Tätigkeitsgebiets..."
2 mins
disagree AllegroTrans : This is about newly-created ("start-up") companies (often dodgy) and not mere restructuring, which is much too wide
3 hrs
disagree Andrew Bramhall : That is something altogether different;
3 hrs
disagree philgoddard : Also, you need to cite your sources if you don't write your answer yourself.
4 hrs
agree Arne Krueger : -1 is wild... It can certainly be part of a restructuring. However, Articles of Association usually only refer to general terms... Not something specific like Sakshi`s entry. See my discussion entry for reference.
4 hrs
Thank you Arne! I have been the centre of attraction since always so everyone's favourite to put -1. But yes, your link does makes sense.
neutral Cilian O'Tuama : Everyone's favourite to disagree with?! That's not true.
2 days 18 hrs
Something went wrong...
+3
4 hrs

shelf or shell companies

See the discussion box.
Peer comment(s):

agree Björn Vrooman : Thanks; I would have taken too long to answer. There may be exceptions (see Arne's link), but I don't think we need to break this down any further.
55 mins
agree AllegroTrans : Really another way of expressing AMM's suggestion
1 hr
Thanks, but I don't agree. All startups are commercial, and all are eventually ready to trade.
agree Andrew Bramhall
4 hrs
neutral Adrian MM. : As per AT, your answer takes my 'off-the-shelf' idea and turns it into an inconclusive 'shell', without attributing any credit. Otherwise, a logical fallacy: start-ups can be not-for-profit - e.g. a charity/a UK co. ltd by guarantee, so *non-commercial*.
1 day 23 hrs
Something went wrong...
-1
7 hrs

Economic Re-establisments

This is from German lawyers, but may work in this case. Not sure if any of this actually exists in English. Could be a German invention itself.

https://www.avocado.de/fileadmin/Blog/Newsletter_Business_in...

As you can read in the text, it includes the terms already mentioned by Phil and Björn.


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 Stunden (2024-05-06 14:39:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Sorry, Economic Re-establishments. Quite a word!

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 Stunden (2024-05-06 15:20:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

https://www.atticus-legal.de/en/trendelenburg.php

Just search for this term. I could not find this text anywhere. Maybe somebody else can?!

It says in England and Wales...
Peer comment(s):

neutral AllegroTrans : It seems like a German invention yes, and I (British) would not know what it means
20 mins
disagree Andrew Bramhall : Me neither, and you haven't even spelt ' establisHment' correctly;
2 hrs
I did, read my text. :) But in any case, I am sure we are on the right track for this one...
Something went wrong...
8 hrs

economic re-incorporation

"The fundamental reasoning vested in the doctrine of an "economic re-incorporation" was later explained by Goette to the following extent: The judgments were to be interpreted as a creditor protection measure to counter the practice of dumping empty "shells" on the market without prior disclosure of such action, especially in light of the risk that "recycled shells" were potential "debt holes" which could negatively affect the survivability of the succeeding business operations."
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=KcpJGRf7l5UC&pg=PA63&lp...
Peer comment(s):

neutral Arne Krueger : I am not sure if "re-incorporation" is a mistranslation in this case. The author seems German again (as in my case). See discussion entry, takes too long to explain here.
2 hrs
I will review the discussion. Thanks, Arne.
neutral AllegroTrans : I think this is about "new" incorporations; if a dormant/insolvent/wound-up company "restarts" using a shell company, that is not re-incorporation (even if it has that appearance) and "economic" is the wrong adjective imo
3 hrs
Thanks, Allegro. Good comment.
Something went wrong...
+1
10 hrs

"constructive" formation of new companies

This is a really interesting terminology question, Sebastian, and a very good example of the English translation not deriving logically from the German term (there are plenty of those in finance and law, as you know!).
This is the English term I found in my own database of past translations, and it came up in some long-form audit reports I translated a number of years ago. I can't tell you know where I found the translation, but it does appear to fit the fact pattern. Here are some links (in German) to "wirtschaftliche Neugründung":
https://www.fgvw.de/neues/gesellschaftsrecht-die-wirtschaftl...
https://www.deutscheranwaltspiegel.de/anwaltspiegel/gmbh-rec...

I'm only giving a confidence level of three because I can't quote you chapter and verse on the English translation.
https://www.dhpg.de/de/newsroom/blog/wirtschaftliche-neugrue...
Peer comment(s):

neutral AllegroTrans : This is on the right lines but I don't think your suggested term would be easily understood // surely "understood" by people "in the trade" is a vital prerequisite at the very least?
3 hrs
So what are you suggesting? "companies that were previously operationally active but then lay dormant for several years and are now being reactivated with a different business purpose? Fine as an explanation, but not as a translation!
agree TonyTK : Probably not the done thing, but I'm supporting this based purely on the certainty that Robin will have researched the hell out of it back when he put it in his glossary. Out of interest: what do you think of "shell company", Robin?
12 hrs
Thanks, Tony. Shell (or "shelf") companies are formed for the express purpose of having no operating activities until they are activated. They can lie dormant for as long as the law in the country concerned allows. That's very different to the case here.
neutral Arne Krueger : But this is not about new companies... The problem is that people may misread (and misunderstand) the term "Neugründung".
13 hrs
Exactly, these are NOT new companies. They are existing companies that have ceased operating for whatever reason and then, at some point in the future, are reactivated with a different Unternehmensgegenstand.
neutral Adrian MM. : 'constructive' - as in E&W + *US* law on notice, trusts & dismissal - means deemed or putative, namely co. formation can be presumed, rather than actual. Apart from 'implied, de facto' partnerships (the Beatles) I've never came across such a presumption.
1 day 17 hrs
Something went wrong...
12 hrs

wirtschaftliche Neugründungen ("phoenixing")

Please see my reference entry
Peer comment(s):

neutral Arne Krueger : Good, but captures only the insolvency case. Interestingly enough, it shines a positive light on Sakshi's entry?!
11 hrs
But maybe Asker's text is about insolvency situations; I have a feeling that it is
Something went wrong...

Reference comments

12 hrs
Reference:

This might help

1. Phoenix companies

Phoenixing, or phoenixism, are terms used to describe the practice of carrying on the same business or trade successively through a series of companies where each becomes insolvent (cannot pay their debts) in turn. Each time this happens, the insolvent company’s business, but not its debts, is transferred to a new, similar ‘phoenix’ company. The insolvent company then ceases to trade and might enter into formal insolvency proceedings (liquidation, administration or administrative receivership) or be dissolved.

2. The law in relation to phoenixing

Companies can fail, be dissolved or face financial difficulties for a variety of reasons apart from misconduct.

So, the law allows owners, directors and employees of insolvent or dissolved companies to set up new companies to carry on a similar business. This is as long as the individuals involved are not personally bankrupt or disqualified from acting in the management of a limited company.

When a company goes into administration or liquidation, the administrator or liquidator will try and get in as much money as possible to pay creditors. Sometimes the best offer will be from the former directors or owners to buy back part or all of the business, including the company’s name or trading name. This is sometimes called a ‘pre-pack’ administration. The law allows this.

However, generally, when a company enters liquidation (this is often referred to as being wound up), insolvency law restricts who can reuse the company’s registered name and trading names.

Unless any exception applies, anyone who was a director in the 12 months before the company went into liquidation is banned from taking part in the management of another business with the same name. This ban lasts for 5 years and also covers names which are so similar they suggest an association with the previous company. More information on the restrictions on re-using a company name after insolvent liquidation and details of the exceptions that allow it.

3. The Insolvency Service’s role

Some companies fail because of director misconduct. It’s our role to investigate suspected cases of misconduct and take action against those who have acted against the public interest.

When a company enters into formal insolvency proceedings, such as liquidation or administration proceedings, the proceedings are managed by an insolvency professional. This is either an insolvency practitioner or an official receiver. They will review the company’s affairs and look at the conduct of the directors. If they suspect possible misconduct, they must confidentially report their concerns to the Insolvency Service for investigation. There is more information about our insolvent company investigations.

If a company has been dissolved, complaints about the conduct of a company’s directors can be made to the Insolvency Service. We have discretionary powers to investigate where it’s appropriate. More information about our dissolved company investigations.

We also have discretionary powers to investigate the affairs of companies that are not in formal insolvency proceedings and have not been dissolved if we suspect there might be serious misconduct in the company. More information about our live company investigations.

If we find evidence of unfit conduct, the Secretary of State has the power to seek a director’s disqualification where it’s in the public interest and there is sufficient evidence to satisfy the court.

4. What we cannot investigate

We cannot use our powers to investigate or resolve individual commercial disputes between companies and their employees, customers, creditors or shareholders. For example, where the complaint is about:

not paying an individual creditor (such as a customer or supplier)
not paying an employee’s wages
not providing a customer with goods or services that they have paid a deposit for
supplying a customer with faulty goods
decisions made by directors that a shareholder disagrees with

These examples are not usually evidence of unfit conduct and are generally considered to be consumer or commercial issues. However, they might be taken into account if they are part of a larger pattern of unfit behaviour.

The main purpose of our investigative powers is to protect the general public and the business community. Individual disputes like those listed must be settled without our involvement. If necessary, you should get independent legal advice to resolve these issues.
5. Director misconduct

Examples of the types of behaviour that can lead to a director’s disqualification include:

fraudulent behaviour
not submitting tax returns or paying tax and any other money due to the Crown
continuing to trade to the disadvantage of creditors at a time when the company was insolvent
conduct that deliberately removes assets that should have been available to pay creditors
letting somebody else run the company for the director
not making sure the company is run properly
not keeping or producing appropriate accounting records
not preparing or filing accounts at Companies House
not filing annual returns at Companies House
not complying with other regulations
not co-operating with any official receiver or insolvency practitioner appointed to the company

You can complain to the Insolvency Service, Companies House or the Serious Fraud Office if you suspect a limited company or its directors of fraud or serious misconduct.
Back to top

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 hrs (2024-05-06 20:27:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------



Group Sites
Eddisons
Springboard
MAF Finance Group
Pugh & Co
Ernest Wilson
BTG Advisory
Mantra Group
Investor Relations
People Search
International
Assets For Sale
Our Futures
Search Site

Begbies Traynor Group

About Us
Our Services
Sectors
Media Centre

Begbies Traynor Group

Home

About Us

Our Services

Sectors

Media Centre
International
Investor Relations

Copyright 2024 © BTG
What is a Phoenix Company and the rules around this process?

What is a Phoenix Company and the rules around this process?
Date Published: 18/10/2023
Understanding a phoenix company and the legal implications

A phoenix company describes a business that has been purchased out a formal insolvency process such as administration or liquidation, often by the existing directors. The term refers to a phoenix rising from the ashes, but there are strict rules that govern the use of this process.

It is not possible for directors of an insolvent company to choose this route without clear evidence that creditor interests will be maximised. This should be the main consideration for any insolvent company - the insolvency practitioner appointed to oversee the administration or liquidation process is obliged to recoup as much money as possible for unsecured creditors.
What are the rules governing phoenix companies?

When considering the returns for unsecured creditors, it is clear that the underlying assets of the old company should be sold on at a fair price and not at an undervalue. This also avoids accusations that directors have simply walked away from the company’s debt.

Professional valuations should be attained, and clear records kept during the decision-making, valuation, marketing and sale of the old company. The ethics of this process have come into question in the past, and some sales have been successfully challenged in court by creditors.

A phoenix company can only come about should the original company have no hope of survival. This can only be determined by a licensed insolvency practitioner. Begbies Traynor offer professional guidance on this and other routes out of insolvency, and are available for appointment as administrators.
How is the phoenix company purchased?

Assuming the purchase is by connected parties such as existing directors and/or shareholders, the buyers may need to purchase the company using their own personal funds if no other investment is available. In some cases not all of the assets are purchased – for example when the new company needs to streamline its operations.

The money received from the sale is used to repay unsecured creditors. Because employees are an asset of the company, their contracts of employment may be transferred over to the phoenix company under TUPE legislation.

If the valuation of assets means that directors cannot afford to buy them all at the same time, a deferred sale and purchase agreement may be available.
What are the rules of a pre pack sale?

There are strict regulations surrounding pre pack sales, intended to protect the interests of unsecured creditors and prevent company directors from escaping their obligations. These include:

Valuation: professional valuations must be provided, as well as the names and qualifications of the valuers. It is recommended that the services of an auctioneer or Chartered Surveyor are used.
Marketing: a broad spectrum of marketing methods must be used to advertise the pre pack sale. These should include online and traditional media outlets.
Notification: creditors must be notified of the sale as soon as possible, but no later than two weeks following the sale date.
Disclosure: full disclosure of all actions and decisions made by the insolvency practitioner is required within a statement sent to creditors, preferably at the same time as notification of the sale.
Investigation: director conduct must be investigated prior to liquidation, and can cover a period of up to two years prior to the date of insolvency.
New company name: this must not be the same or similar to the old company, as it could indicate an intention to mislead the public or any new creditors.

What are some of the potential issues for a phoenix company?

The ‘newco’ may need to be started using the purchasers’ personal funds if no external investment is available. Liabilities can be significant from the start, including employment contracts transferred via Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment), or TUPE, regulations.

If the old company had tax or National Insurance arrears, it is likely that HMRC will demand upfront deposits from the phoenix company to reduce their exposure to risk. These extra demands can be difficult to meet for a new company, and may delay the start of trade. They may even negatively influence the decision to buy.

If the company goes into liquidation, the trading name of the new company must not be the same (or similar to) that of the insolvent company, subject to certain conditions. The improper use of an insolvent company's name represents a breach of the Insolvency Act 1986, and director's could face imprisonment or personal liability for company debts should they be found guilty of this.
Professional and legal advice

Buying a phoenix company is a complex process, and involves multiple obligations on the part of the purchasers for the sale to be viewed as legitimate. Appointing an insolvency practitioner to determine whether this could be an an option for you and your company is the first step.

https://www.begbies-traynorgroup.com/articles/rescue-options...
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search