May 6 07:33
12 days ago
43 viewers *
German term
wirtschaftliche Neugründungen
German to English
Bus/Financial
Business/Commerce (general)
Hi,
Translating the record of the shareholders’ meeting of a German GmbH (Memorandum and Articles of Association, notarised).
When asking Google to define the term concerned, it does not look all that straightforward anymore ...
Overly free translations not welcome as we will have to confirm the accuracy of the translation, slightly verbose translations acceptable this time around.
DE:
2.4
Den Beteiligten ist bekannt, dass die Satzungsänderung erst mit ihrer Eintragung im Handelsregister wirksam wird.
2.5
Wirtschaftliche Neugründungen sind dem Registergericht offen zu legen.
EN:
Any economic start-ups/establishments are to be disclosed to the registration court.
Best regards,
Translating the record of the shareholders’ meeting of a German GmbH (Memorandum and Articles of Association, notarised).
When asking Google to define the term concerned, it does not look all that straightforward anymore ...
Overly free translations not welcome as we will have to confirm the accuracy of the translation, slightly verbose translations acceptable this time around.
DE:
2.4
Den Beteiligten ist bekannt, dass die Satzungsänderung erst mit ihrer Eintragung im Handelsregister wirksam wird.
2.5
Wirtschaftliche Neugründungen sind dem Registergericht offen zu legen.
EN:
Any economic start-ups/establishments are to be disclosed to the registration court.
Best regards,
Proposed translations
(English)
References
This might help | AllegroTrans |
Proposed translations
+2
26 mins
German term (edited):
wirtschaftlich/e Neugründung/en
Selected
commercial, ready-to-trade start-up/s
Wirtschaftliche Neugründungen sind dem Registergericht offen zu legen : use a passive construction, even if an active one is otherwise stylistically recommended:
'The Court of Registration is to be disclosed any commercial, ready-to-trade start-ups'
First weblink: 'GmbH: Wirtschaftliche Neugründung – Was ist das? 1. Eine GmbH wurde *auf Vorrat* = ready-to-trade, off-the-shelf etc. commercial co. gegründet. Sie hat bislang noch keinen Geschäftsbetrieb aufgenommen. Sie ruhte nur, damit sie im Bedarfsfall schnell aktiviert werden kann. 2. Der andere Fall stellt eine GmbH dar, die ihren Geschäftsbetrieb eingestellt hat und als *leerer Mantel* bestehen bleibt eben zu dem Zweck, im Bedarfsfall schnell wieder aktiviert werden zu können.'
'The Court of Registration is to be disclosed any commercial, ready-to-trade start-ups'
First weblink: 'GmbH: Wirtschaftliche Neugründung – Was ist das? 1. Eine GmbH wurde *auf Vorrat* = ready-to-trade, off-the-shelf etc. commercial co. gegründet. Sie hat bislang noch keinen Geschäftsbetrieb aufgenommen. Sie ruhte nur, damit sie im Bedarfsfall schnell aktiviert werden kann. 2. Der andere Fall stellt eine GmbH dar, die ihren Geschäftsbetrieb eingestellt hat und als *leerer Mantel* bestehen bleibt eben zu dem Zweck, im Bedarfsfall schnell wieder aktiviert werden zu können.'
Example sentence:
IATE: de Neugründung von Industriebetrieben COM en start-up of industrial enterprise
Discover what it takes to thrive as a new trade start-up.
Reference:
http://www.proz.com/kudoz/german-to-romanian/law-contracts/6278461-wirtschaftliche-neugründung.html
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Maja_K
: https://www.fgvw.de/neues/archiv-2023/gesellschaftsrecht-ges...
1 min
|
Lepo hvala, danke schön and thanks, Maja!
|
|
agree |
AllegroTrans
3 hrs
|
Thanks and danke schön, Chris! You've picked another winner.
|
|
neutral |
philgoddard
: Bits of your explanation hint at the correct meaning, but I don't feel your translation captures it. And 'the court is to be disclosed' is ungrammatical.
4 hrs
|
You're right only on the 1st count of failing to nail an exact 'ready to activate' equivalent, though I used to work in (BrE) company (AmE) corporate & partnership. On the 2nd count, I spelled out the trivial objections to using passive vs. active form.
|
3 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
-3
28 mins
Business Restructuring
encompasses a range of activities including reorganizing legal, ownership, operational, or other structures of a company to make it more profitable, organized, or better equipped for current business demands...
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/restructuring.asp
It discusses the reasons behind restructuring such as improving profitability, merging with other companies, or adapting to a changing economic environment.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/restructuring.asp
It discusses the reasons behind restructuring such as improving profitability, merging with other companies, or adapting to a changing economic environment.
Peer comment(s):
disagree |
Maja_K
: https://www.dhpg.de/de/newsroom/blog/wirtschaftliche-neugrue... --> "... sei es auch unter wesentlicher Umgestaltung, Einschränkung oder Erweiterung des Tätigkeitsgebiets..."
2 mins
|
disagree |
AllegroTrans
: This is about newly-created ("start-up") companies (often dodgy) and not mere restructuring, which is much too wide
3 hrs
|
disagree |
Andrew Bramhall
: That is something altogether different;
3 hrs
|
disagree |
philgoddard
: Also, you need to cite your sources if you don't write your answer yourself.
4 hrs
|
agree |
Arne Krueger
: -1 is wild... It can certainly be part of a restructuring. However, Articles of Association usually only refer to general terms... Not something specific like Sakshi`s entry. See my discussion entry for reference.
4 hrs
|
Thank you Arne! I have been the centre of attraction since always so everyone's favourite to put -1. But yes, your link does makes sense.
|
|
neutral |
Cilian O'Tuama
: Everyone's favourite to disagree with?! That's not true.
2 days 18 hrs
|
+3
4 hrs
shelf or shell companies
See the discussion box.
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Björn Vrooman
: Thanks; I would have taken too long to answer. There may be exceptions (see Arne's link), but I don't think we need to break this down any further.
55 mins
|
agree |
AllegroTrans
: Really another way of expressing AMM's suggestion
1 hr
|
Thanks, but I don't agree. All startups are commercial, and all are eventually ready to trade.
|
|
agree |
Andrew Bramhall
4 hrs
|
neutral |
Adrian MM.
: As per AT, your answer takes my 'off-the-shelf' idea and turns it into an inconclusive 'shell', without attributing any credit. Otherwise, a logical fallacy: start-ups can be not-for-profit - e.g. a charity/a UK co. ltd by guarantee, so *non-commercial*.
1 day 23 hrs
|
-1
7 hrs
Economic Re-establisments
This is from German lawyers, but may work in this case. Not sure if any of this actually exists in English. Could be a German invention itself.
https://www.avocado.de/fileadmin/Blog/Newsletter_Business_in...
As you can read in the text, it includes the terms already mentioned by Phil and Björn.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 Stunden (2024-05-06 14:39:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry, Economic Re-establishments. Quite a word!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 Stunden (2024-05-06 15:20:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
https://www.atticus-legal.de/en/trendelenburg.php
Just search for this term. I could not find this text anywhere. Maybe somebody else can?!
It says in England and Wales...
https://www.avocado.de/fileadmin/Blog/Newsletter_Business_in...
As you can read in the text, it includes the terms already mentioned by Phil and Björn.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 Stunden (2024-05-06 14:39:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry, Economic Re-establishments. Quite a word!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 Stunden (2024-05-06 15:20:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
https://www.atticus-legal.de/en/trendelenburg.php
Just search for this term. I could not find this text anywhere. Maybe somebody else can?!
It says in England and Wales...
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
AllegroTrans
: It seems like a German invention yes, and I (British) would not know what it means
20 mins
|
disagree |
Andrew Bramhall
: Me neither, and you haven't even spelt ' establisHment' correctly;
2 hrs
|
I did, read my text. :) But in any case, I am sure we are on the right track for this one...
|
8 hrs
economic re-incorporation
"The fundamental reasoning vested in the doctrine of an "economic re-incorporation" was later explained by Goette to the following extent: The judgments were to be interpreted as a creditor protection measure to counter the practice of dumping empty "shells" on the market without prior disclosure of such action, especially in light of the risk that "recycled shells" were potential "debt holes" which could negatively affect the survivability of the succeeding business operations."
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=KcpJGRf7l5UC&pg=PA63&lp...
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=KcpJGRf7l5UC&pg=PA63&lp...
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
Arne Krueger
: I am not sure if "re-incorporation" is a mistranslation in this case. The author seems German again (as in my case). See discussion entry, takes too long to explain here.
2 hrs
|
I will review the discussion. Thanks, Arne.
|
|
neutral |
AllegroTrans
: I think this is about "new" incorporations; if a dormant/insolvent/wound-up company "restarts" using a shell company, that is not re-incorporation (even if it has that appearance) and "economic" is the wrong adjective imo
3 hrs
|
Thanks, Allegro. Good comment.
|
+1
10 hrs
"constructive" formation of new companies
This is a really interesting terminology question, Sebastian, and a very good example of the English translation not deriving logically from the German term (there are plenty of those in finance and law, as you know!).
This is the English term I found in my own database of past translations, and it came up in some long-form audit reports I translated a number of years ago. I can't tell you know where I found the translation, but it does appear to fit the fact pattern. Here are some links (in German) to "wirtschaftliche Neugründung":
https://www.fgvw.de/neues/gesellschaftsrecht-die-wirtschaftl...
https://www.deutscheranwaltspiegel.de/anwaltspiegel/gmbh-rec...
I'm only giving a confidence level of three because I can't quote you chapter and verse on the English translation.
https://www.dhpg.de/de/newsroom/blog/wirtschaftliche-neugrue...
This is the English term I found in my own database of past translations, and it came up in some long-form audit reports I translated a number of years ago. I can't tell you know where I found the translation, but it does appear to fit the fact pattern. Here are some links (in German) to "wirtschaftliche Neugründung":
https://www.fgvw.de/neues/gesellschaftsrecht-die-wirtschaftl...
https://www.deutscheranwaltspiegel.de/anwaltspiegel/gmbh-rec...
I'm only giving a confidence level of three because I can't quote you chapter and verse on the English translation.
https://www.dhpg.de/de/newsroom/blog/wirtschaftliche-neugrue...
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
AllegroTrans
: This is on the right lines but I don't think your suggested term would be easily understood // surely "understood" by people "in the trade" is a vital prerequisite at the very least?
3 hrs
|
So what are you suggesting? "companies that were previously operationally active but then lay dormant for several years and are now being reactivated with a different business purpose? Fine as an explanation, but not as a translation!
|
|
agree |
TonyTK
: Probably not the done thing, but I'm supporting this based purely on the certainty that Robin will have researched the hell out of it back when he put it in his glossary. Out of interest: what do you think of "shell company", Robin?
12 hrs
|
Thanks, Tony. Shell (or "shelf") companies are formed for the express purpose of having no operating activities until they are activated. They can lie dormant for as long as the law in the country concerned allows. That's very different to the case here.
|
|
neutral |
Arne Krueger
: But this is not about new companies... The problem is that people may misread (and misunderstand) the term "Neugründung".
13 hrs
|
Exactly, these are NOT new companies. They are existing companies that have ceased operating for whatever reason and then, at some point in the future, are reactivated with a different Unternehmensgegenstand.
|
|
neutral |
Adrian MM.
: 'constructive' - as in E&W + *US* law on notice, trusts & dismissal - means deemed or putative, namely co. formation can be presumed, rather than actual. Apart from 'implied, de facto' partnerships (the Beatles) I've never came across such a presumption.
1 day 17 hrs
|
12 hrs
wirtschaftliche Neugründungen ("phoenixing")
Please see my reference entry
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
Arne Krueger
: Good, but captures only the insolvency case. Interestingly enough, it shines a positive light on Sakshi's entry?!
11 hrs
|
But maybe Asker's text is about insolvency situations; I have a feeling that it is
|
Reference comments
12 hrs
Reference:
This might help
1. Phoenix companies
Phoenixing, or phoenixism, are terms used to describe the practice of carrying on the same business or trade successively through a series of companies where each becomes insolvent (cannot pay their debts) in turn. Each time this happens, the insolvent company’s business, but not its debts, is transferred to a new, similar ‘phoenix’ company. The insolvent company then ceases to trade and might enter into formal insolvency proceedings (liquidation, administration or administrative receivership) or be dissolved.
2. The law in relation to phoenixing
Companies can fail, be dissolved or face financial difficulties for a variety of reasons apart from misconduct.
So, the law allows owners, directors and employees of insolvent or dissolved companies to set up new companies to carry on a similar business. This is as long as the individuals involved are not personally bankrupt or disqualified from acting in the management of a limited company.
When a company goes into administration or liquidation, the administrator or liquidator will try and get in as much money as possible to pay creditors. Sometimes the best offer will be from the former directors or owners to buy back part or all of the business, including the company’s name or trading name. This is sometimes called a ‘pre-pack’ administration. The law allows this.
However, generally, when a company enters liquidation (this is often referred to as being wound up), insolvency law restricts who can reuse the company’s registered name and trading names.
Unless any exception applies, anyone who was a director in the 12 months before the company went into liquidation is banned from taking part in the management of another business with the same name. This ban lasts for 5 years and also covers names which are so similar they suggest an association with the previous company. More information on the restrictions on re-using a company name after insolvent liquidation and details of the exceptions that allow it.
3. The Insolvency Service’s role
Some companies fail because of director misconduct. It’s our role to investigate suspected cases of misconduct and take action against those who have acted against the public interest.
When a company enters into formal insolvency proceedings, such as liquidation or administration proceedings, the proceedings are managed by an insolvency professional. This is either an insolvency practitioner or an official receiver. They will review the company’s affairs and look at the conduct of the directors. If they suspect possible misconduct, they must confidentially report their concerns to the Insolvency Service for investigation. There is more information about our insolvent company investigations.
If a company has been dissolved, complaints about the conduct of a company’s directors can be made to the Insolvency Service. We have discretionary powers to investigate where it’s appropriate. More information about our dissolved company investigations.
We also have discretionary powers to investigate the affairs of companies that are not in formal insolvency proceedings and have not been dissolved if we suspect there might be serious misconduct in the company. More information about our live company investigations.
If we find evidence of unfit conduct, the Secretary of State has the power to seek a director’s disqualification where it’s in the public interest and there is sufficient evidence to satisfy the court.
4. What we cannot investigate
We cannot use our powers to investigate or resolve individual commercial disputes between companies and their employees, customers, creditors or shareholders. For example, where the complaint is about:
not paying an individual creditor (such as a customer or supplier)
not paying an employee’s wages
not providing a customer with goods or services that they have paid a deposit for
supplying a customer with faulty goods
decisions made by directors that a shareholder disagrees with
These examples are not usually evidence of unfit conduct and are generally considered to be consumer or commercial issues. However, they might be taken into account if they are part of a larger pattern of unfit behaviour.
The main purpose of our investigative powers is to protect the general public and the business community. Individual disputes like those listed must be settled without our involvement. If necessary, you should get independent legal advice to resolve these issues.
5. Director misconduct
Examples of the types of behaviour that can lead to a director’s disqualification include:
fraudulent behaviour
not submitting tax returns or paying tax and any other money due to the Crown
continuing to trade to the disadvantage of creditors at a time when the company was insolvent
conduct that deliberately removes assets that should have been available to pay creditors
letting somebody else run the company for the director
not making sure the company is run properly
not keeping or producing appropriate accounting records
not preparing or filing accounts at Companies House
not filing annual returns at Companies House
not complying with other regulations
not co-operating with any official receiver or insolvency practitioner appointed to the company
You can complain to the Insolvency Service, Companies House or the Serious Fraud Office if you suspect a limited company or its directors of fraud or serious misconduct.
Back to top
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 hrs (2024-05-06 20:27:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Group Sites
Eddisons
Springboard
MAF Finance Group
Pugh & Co
Ernest Wilson
BTG Advisory
Mantra Group
Investor Relations
People Search
International
Assets For Sale
Our Futures
Search Site
Begbies Traynor Group
About Us
Our Services
Sectors
Media Centre
Begbies Traynor Group
Home
About Us
Our Services
Sectors
Media Centre
International
Investor Relations
Copyright 2024 © BTG
What is a Phoenix Company and the rules around this process?
What is a Phoenix Company and the rules around this process?
Date Published: 18/10/2023
Understanding a phoenix company and the legal implications
A phoenix company describes a business that has been purchased out a formal insolvency process such as administration or liquidation, often by the existing directors. The term refers to a phoenix rising from the ashes, but there are strict rules that govern the use of this process.
It is not possible for directors of an insolvent company to choose this route without clear evidence that creditor interests will be maximised. This should be the main consideration for any insolvent company - the insolvency practitioner appointed to oversee the administration or liquidation process is obliged to recoup as much money as possible for unsecured creditors.
What are the rules governing phoenix companies?
When considering the returns for unsecured creditors, it is clear that the underlying assets of the old company should be sold on at a fair price and not at an undervalue. This also avoids accusations that directors have simply walked away from the company’s debt.
Professional valuations should be attained, and clear records kept during the decision-making, valuation, marketing and sale of the old company. The ethics of this process have come into question in the past, and some sales have been successfully challenged in court by creditors.
A phoenix company can only come about should the original company have no hope of survival. This can only be determined by a licensed insolvency practitioner. Begbies Traynor offer professional guidance on this and other routes out of insolvency, and are available for appointment as administrators.
How is the phoenix company purchased?
Assuming the purchase is by connected parties such as existing directors and/or shareholders, the buyers may need to purchase the company using their own personal funds if no other investment is available. In some cases not all of the assets are purchased – for example when the new company needs to streamline its operations.
The money received from the sale is used to repay unsecured creditors. Because employees are an asset of the company, their contracts of employment may be transferred over to the phoenix company under TUPE legislation.
If the valuation of assets means that directors cannot afford to buy them all at the same time, a deferred sale and purchase agreement may be available.
What are the rules of a pre pack sale?
There are strict regulations surrounding pre pack sales, intended to protect the interests of unsecured creditors and prevent company directors from escaping their obligations. These include:
Valuation: professional valuations must be provided, as well as the names and qualifications of the valuers. It is recommended that the services of an auctioneer or Chartered Surveyor are used.
Marketing: a broad spectrum of marketing methods must be used to advertise the pre pack sale. These should include online and traditional media outlets.
Notification: creditors must be notified of the sale as soon as possible, but no later than two weeks following the sale date.
Disclosure: full disclosure of all actions and decisions made by the insolvency practitioner is required within a statement sent to creditors, preferably at the same time as notification of the sale.
Investigation: director conduct must be investigated prior to liquidation, and can cover a period of up to two years prior to the date of insolvency.
New company name: this must not be the same or similar to the old company, as it could indicate an intention to mislead the public or any new creditors.
What are some of the potential issues for a phoenix company?
The ‘newco’ may need to be started using the purchasers’ personal funds if no external investment is available. Liabilities can be significant from the start, including employment contracts transferred via Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment), or TUPE, regulations.
If the old company had tax or National Insurance arrears, it is likely that HMRC will demand upfront deposits from the phoenix company to reduce their exposure to risk. These extra demands can be difficult to meet for a new company, and may delay the start of trade. They may even negatively influence the decision to buy.
If the company goes into liquidation, the trading name of the new company must not be the same (or similar to) that of the insolvent company, subject to certain conditions. The improper use of an insolvent company's name represents a breach of the Insolvency Act 1986, and director's could face imprisonment or personal liability for company debts should they be found guilty of this.
Professional and legal advice
Buying a phoenix company is a complex process, and involves multiple obligations on the part of the purchasers for the sale to be viewed as legitimate. Appointing an insolvency practitioner to determine whether this could be an an option for you and your company is the first step.
https://www.begbies-traynorgroup.com/articles/rescue-options...
Phoenixing, or phoenixism, are terms used to describe the practice of carrying on the same business or trade successively through a series of companies where each becomes insolvent (cannot pay their debts) in turn. Each time this happens, the insolvent company’s business, but not its debts, is transferred to a new, similar ‘phoenix’ company. The insolvent company then ceases to trade and might enter into formal insolvency proceedings (liquidation, administration or administrative receivership) or be dissolved.
2. The law in relation to phoenixing
Companies can fail, be dissolved or face financial difficulties for a variety of reasons apart from misconduct.
So, the law allows owners, directors and employees of insolvent or dissolved companies to set up new companies to carry on a similar business. This is as long as the individuals involved are not personally bankrupt or disqualified from acting in the management of a limited company.
When a company goes into administration or liquidation, the administrator or liquidator will try and get in as much money as possible to pay creditors. Sometimes the best offer will be from the former directors or owners to buy back part or all of the business, including the company’s name or trading name. This is sometimes called a ‘pre-pack’ administration. The law allows this.
However, generally, when a company enters liquidation (this is often referred to as being wound up), insolvency law restricts who can reuse the company’s registered name and trading names.
Unless any exception applies, anyone who was a director in the 12 months before the company went into liquidation is banned from taking part in the management of another business with the same name. This ban lasts for 5 years and also covers names which are so similar they suggest an association with the previous company. More information on the restrictions on re-using a company name after insolvent liquidation and details of the exceptions that allow it.
3. The Insolvency Service’s role
Some companies fail because of director misconduct. It’s our role to investigate suspected cases of misconduct and take action against those who have acted against the public interest.
When a company enters into formal insolvency proceedings, such as liquidation or administration proceedings, the proceedings are managed by an insolvency professional. This is either an insolvency practitioner or an official receiver. They will review the company’s affairs and look at the conduct of the directors. If they suspect possible misconduct, they must confidentially report their concerns to the Insolvency Service for investigation. There is more information about our insolvent company investigations.
If a company has been dissolved, complaints about the conduct of a company’s directors can be made to the Insolvency Service. We have discretionary powers to investigate where it’s appropriate. More information about our dissolved company investigations.
We also have discretionary powers to investigate the affairs of companies that are not in formal insolvency proceedings and have not been dissolved if we suspect there might be serious misconduct in the company. More information about our live company investigations.
If we find evidence of unfit conduct, the Secretary of State has the power to seek a director’s disqualification where it’s in the public interest and there is sufficient evidence to satisfy the court.
4. What we cannot investigate
We cannot use our powers to investigate or resolve individual commercial disputes between companies and their employees, customers, creditors or shareholders. For example, where the complaint is about:
not paying an individual creditor (such as a customer or supplier)
not paying an employee’s wages
not providing a customer with goods or services that they have paid a deposit for
supplying a customer with faulty goods
decisions made by directors that a shareholder disagrees with
These examples are not usually evidence of unfit conduct and are generally considered to be consumer or commercial issues. However, they might be taken into account if they are part of a larger pattern of unfit behaviour.
The main purpose of our investigative powers is to protect the general public and the business community. Individual disputes like those listed must be settled without our involvement. If necessary, you should get independent legal advice to resolve these issues.
5. Director misconduct
Examples of the types of behaviour that can lead to a director’s disqualification include:
fraudulent behaviour
not submitting tax returns or paying tax and any other money due to the Crown
continuing to trade to the disadvantage of creditors at a time when the company was insolvent
conduct that deliberately removes assets that should have been available to pay creditors
letting somebody else run the company for the director
not making sure the company is run properly
not keeping or producing appropriate accounting records
not preparing or filing accounts at Companies House
not filing annual returns at Companies House
not complying with other regulations
not co-operating with any official receiver or insolvency practitioner appointed to the company
You can complain to the Insolvency Service, Companies House or the Serious Fraud Office if you suspect a limited company or its directors of fraud or serious misconduct.
Back to top
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 hrs (2024-05-06 20:27:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Group Sites
Eddisons
Springboard
MAF Finance Group
Pugh & Co
Ernest Wilson
BTG Advisory
Mantra Group
Investor Relations
People Search
International
Assets For Sale
Our Futures
Search Site
Begbies Traynor Group
About Us
Our Services
Sectors
Media Centre
Begbies Traynor Group
Home
About Us
Our Services
Sectors
Media Centre
International
Investor Relations
Copyright 2024 © BTG
What is a Phoenix Company and the rules around this process?
What is a Phoenix Company and the rules around this process?
Date Published: 18/10/2023
Understanding a phoenix company and the legal implications
A phoenix company describes a business that has been purchased out a formal insolvency process such as administration or liquidation, often by the existing directors. The term refers to a phoenix rising from the ashes, but there are strict rules that govern the use of this process.
It is not possible for directors of an insolvent company to choose this route without clear evidence that creditor interests will be maximised. This should be the main consideration for any insolvent company - the insolvency practitioner appointed to oversee the administration or liquidation process is obliged to recoup as much money as possible for unsecured creditors.
What are the rules governing phoenix companies?
When considering the returns for unsecured creditors, it is clear that the underlying assets of the old company should be sold on at a fair price and not at an undervalue. This also avoids accusations that directors have simply walked away from the company’s debt.
Professional valuations should be attained, and clear records kept during the decision-making, valuation, marketing and sale of the old company. The ethics of this process have come into question in the past, and some sales have been successfully challenged in court by creditors.
A phoenix company can only come about should the original company have no hope of survival. This can only be determined by a licensed insolvency practitioner. Begbies Traynor offer professional guidance on this and other routes out of insolvency, and are available for appointment as administrators.
How is the phoenix company purchased?
Assuming the purchase is by connected parties such as existing directors and/or shareholders, the buyers may need to purchase the company using their own personal funds if no other investment is available. In some cases not all of the assets are purchased – for example when the new company needs to streamline its operations.
The money received from the sale is used to repay unsecured creditors. Because employees are an asset of the company, their contracts of employment may be transferred over to the phoenix company under TUPE legislation.
If the valuation of assets means that directors cannot afford to buy them all at the same time, a deferred sale and purchase agreement may be available.
What are the rules of a pre pack sale?
There are strict regulations surrounding pre pack sales, intended to protect the interests of unsecured creditors and prevent company directors from escaping their obligations. These include:
Valuation: professional valuations must be provided, as well as the names and qualifications of the valuers. It is recommended that the services of an auctioneer or Chartered Surveyor are used.
Marketing: a broad spectrum of marketing methods must be used to advertise the pre pack sale. These should include online and traditional media outlets.
Notification: creditors must be notified of the sale as soon as possible, but no later than two weeks following the sale date.
Disclosure: full disclosure of all actions and decisions made by the insolvency practitioner is required within a statement sent to creditors, preferably at the same time as notification of the sale.
Investigation: director conduct must be investigated prior to liquidation, and can cover a period of up to two years prior to the date of insolvency.
New company name: this must not be the same or similar to the old company, as it could indicate an intention to mislead the public or any new creditors.
What are some of the potential issues for a phoenix company?
The ‘newco’ may need to be started using the purchasers’ personal funds if no external investment is available. Liabilities can be significant from the start, including employment contracts transferred via Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment), or TUPE, regulations.
If the old company had tax or National Insurance arrears, it is likely that HMRC will demand upfront deposits from the phoenix company to reduce their exposure to risk. These extra demands can be difficult to meet for a new company, and may delay the start of trade. They may even negatively influence the decision to buy.
If the company goes into liquidation, the trading name of the new company must not be the same (or similar to) that of the insolvent company, subject to certain conditions. The improper use of an insolvent company's name represents a breach of the Insolvency Act 1986, and director's could face imprisonment or personal liability for company debts should they be found guilty of this.
Professional and legal advice
Buying a phoenix company is a complex process, and involves multiple obligations on the part of the purchasers for the sale to be viewed as legitimate. Appointing an insolvency practitioner to determine whether this could be an an option for you and your company is the first step.
https://www.begbies-traynorgroup.com/articles/rescue-options...
Discussion
https://www.gov.uk/restart-a-non-trading-or-dormant-company
That's the Mantel-GmbH part, basically, though being considered dormant, for corporation tax at least, includes not only a business that has "stopped trading and has no other income, for example investments" but also any "new limited company that hasn’t started trading."
So, if someone wants to turn this into a verb phrase, I'm all ears. However, it's still not clear to me what purpose this sentence serves here. Here's an example:
https://www.ihk-muenchen.de/de/Service/Recht-und-Steuern/Ver...
How does that sentence fit in there?
I assume it's because of the previously mentioned "Satzungsänderung":
"Der entscheidende Zeitpunkt dafür ist die Satzungsänderung, die die wirtschaftliche Neugründung der ruhenden GmbH auslöst."
https://www.appelhagen.de/informationen/news/einzelansicht/a...
But why pluralize and make it a general statement? Sorry if I don't see it right now.
To all of you, have a nice evening; have to bow out here.
"Problematisch ist unter Umständen jedoch die Abgrenzung der wirtschaftlichen Neugründung einer Mantelgesellschaft einerseits von der Umstrukturierung bzw. Sanierung einer Gesellschaft andererseits...Nach der Rechtsprechung des BGH sind beide Fälle strikt voneinander zu trennen und nur die Verwendung einer Mantelgesellschaft den Regeln der wirtschaftlichen Neugründung zu unterwerfen."
https://www.dnoti.de/download/?tx_dnotionlineplusapi_downloa...
"Eine als wirtschaftliche Neugründung anzusehende Mantelverwendung liegt in Abgrenzung zu der Umorganisation (Umstrukturierung) oder Sanierung einer – noch – aktiven GmbH vor, wenn eine GmbH eine 'leere Hülse' geworden ist, also kein aktives Unternehmen mehr betreibt,..."
https://www.juris.de/static/infodienst/autoren/D_KORE4066420...
The second link is from this year. The only thing that seems certain here is the use of a shell/shelf company in most cases; I don't think your link disputes that.
Have a nice Monday
https://www.heuking.de/de/news-events/newsletter-fachbeitrae...
https://www.iww.de/bbp/unternehmensberatung/gesellschaftsrec...
The difference between a "Gründung" and a "Neugründung" is the reuse of an existing structure or vehicle:
"In die Situation einer wirtschaftlichen Neugründung können Gesellschafter und Geschäftsführer auf zwei unterschiedliche Arten geraten. In der einen Variante, der Verwendung einer Vorrats-GmbH geschieht dies quasi mit Vorsatz, wenngleich auch nicht immer im Bewusstsein der sich ergebenden rechtlichen Konsequenzen. In der anderen Variante, der Wiederverwendung einer vorübergehend inaktiven Gesellschaft ist die ‒ meist unerfreuliche ‒ Überraschung umso größer."
So while I mostly agree with Adrian, just saying "newly created" doesn't work.
Also, what's been missing is the other way to get to a Neugründung, a Mantel-Gmbh [Adrian mentioned it, but I don't see it as part of his answer].
Cf.
https://www.notar-von-bergner.de/gmbh-verkaufen-die-wichtigs...
https://www.haufe.de/recht/deutsches-anwalt-office-premium/1...
https://www.proz.com/kudoz/german-to-english/law-contracts/4...
Von Haufe: "Indizien einer wirtschaftlichen Neugründung können insbesondere sein, dass die Firma oder der Unternehmensgegenstand geändert, der Sitz verlegt, die Geschäftsführung ausgetauscht oder die Geschäftsanteile veräußert werden."
Hier geht es doch um "changing a company's purpose" etc., also um ein *abstraktes* Konzept, nicht um das "vehicle" (wie ein SPAC), was dazu benutzt wird?
Vielleicht bis später und vielen Dank fürs Mitlesen.
"Offenlegung der wirtschaftlichen Neugründung
Werden Shelf Companies oder Shell Companies verwendet und ihnen (neues) Leben eingehaucht, muss diese Aktivierung als wirtschaftliche Neugründung gegenüber dem Registergericht offengelegt werden. So bekommt das Registergericht die Chance, zu prüfen, ob die Kapitalausstattung der Gesellschaft ordnungsgemäß ist – wie bei einer Neugründung. Ist das Gesellschaftsvermögen im Zeitpunkt der Offenlegung zu niedrig und erreicht es nicht die Stammkapitalziffer, müssen die Gesellschafter diese Lücke auffüllen."
https://www.cmshs-bloggt.de/gesellschaftsrecht/mergers-acqui...
Jetzt muss ich aber selber weiter arbeiten.
Grüße
Foreign investors, too, regularly use a GmbH as an operating or holding company in Germany. They have the choice between forming a new GmbH and buying a shelf company (Vorratsgesellschaft)."
https://vorratsgesellschaften.dnotv.de/english-version/why-a...
"Instead of establishing a completely new company the purchase of a so-called shelf company is possible. This will be a bare-shell company deemed to be formed by a service provider and without business activities."
https://www.heuking.de/fileadmin/DATA/Dokumente/Internationa...
"What is a shelf company?
A shelf company is a limited company that has been pre-registered with Companies House (the UK’s registrar of companies) for the purpose of selling it on at a later date.
Shelf companies are also often referred to as ‘off the shelf’ or ‘ready made’ companies."
https://www.1stformations.co.uk/blog/shelf-companies/
[Majas Links sind auch gut; ich fand das bei Haufe nur übersichtlicher.]
Klingt für mich nach einer "shell company", bspw.:
"For these purposes a Shell Company is a company which:
is not carrying on a trade
is not a company with an investment business; and
is not carrying on a UK property business."
https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/company-taxation-ma...
Das passt doch ganz gut:
"The law also allows business owners to create a shell company with the sole purpose to hold funds prior to setting up a new limited or any other type of company, and then transfer the said funds there. An example of this would be when you are closing an existing company and you want to redistribute its assets to a new company that you plan to start."
https://www.yourcompanyformations.co.uk/blog/how-secret-comp...
Vielleicht kann ich nachher nochmal schauen.
Beste Grüße