Jul 8, 2023 07:15
10 mos ago
25 viewers *
French term
Stocks d'outillages hors MM
French to English
Bus/Financial
Finance (general)
Balance sheet
As it is a balance sheet table, I cannot provide further details (or context).
Proposed translations
(English)
3 | Stocks of equipment not in the MM module | SafeTex |
3 | parent company | Charlie Bavington |
Proposed translations
1 hr
Stocks of equipment not in the MM module
It seems to be a material management module in SAP
See reference and all will be clear why I think it's this
See reference and all will be clear why I think it's this
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
Charlie Bavington
: not impossible but it sounds like these might be fixed assets and SAP has an FA module for handling assets. Of course, not all companies use software in the way the publishers intend it to be used.... :-)
2 hrs
|
3 hrs
parent company
As in maison mère.
Items held other than by the parent co.
There is always context for these things: is it an asset or liability, what heading is it under (tangible, intangible, fixed, current, etc.) what items come before and after, etc.
But one can imagine a b/s splitting some items between parent and subsidiaries and while I don't recall seeing MM on a b/s, I've seen it elsewhere to refer to a parent co.
Items held other than by the parent co.
There is always context for these things: is it an asset or liability, what heading is it under (tangible, intangible, fixed, current, etc.) what items come before and after, etc.
But one can imagine a b/s splitting some items between parent and subsidiaries and while I don't recall seeing MM on a b/s, I've seen it elsewhere to refer to a parent co.
Peer comment(s):
neutral |
AllegroTrans
: Good guess, but we need context
38 mins
|
Absolutely. I wasn't going to bother (I didn't rejoin here to get involved in kudoz nonsense again!) but the idea struck me while commenting on the SAP idea (& I only did that 'cos I just finished a huge SAP job), so I stuck it down :-)
|
|
neutral |
Daryo
: It could be that - sounds quite plausible. But off the top of my head I could think of at least 2 or 3 equally plausible alternatives. Without usable context, it's only a guessing game.
4 hrs
|
Discussion
Even if the text itself looks rather cryptic on its own, just from nothing more than the name of the company, TONS and TONS of "background information" can be quickly found.
IOW in 99.99% of cases plenty of "context" is there - if you know how/where to look for it.
There is also the equivalent of "if you can't figure out how to make it work, you could always read the instruction manual".
Translated here as: "you can always ask the authors"?
If she's said no more context available, why not simply believe her? -or at least give her the benefit of the doubt this time!
"MM" does not exist in a vacuum, come on Eren